Jesus predicted that not one stone of
the Jewish Temple would remain atop
another. The Romans utterly destroyed
the Temple in 70 A.D. What many people
don't know is that in 363 A.D. the Jews
tried to rebuild it, but God would have
none of this. In doing so, Jews
themselves took the remaining stones
from the Temple Mount. In hindsight,
the extraordinary act of Moshe Dayan
handing over the Temple Mount to the
Muslims can actually bee seen as an Act
of God. This is because, according to
Scripture -only after the Lord returns
will the Jewish Temple be rebuilt.
The dual destruction of
the two temples, five hundred years
apart, marks two central eras in Jewish
history: the first marks the beginning
of the Babylonian Exile; the second
marks the beginning of the Jewish
Diaspora.
For the last 1900 years, Jews have
prayed that God would allow for the
rebuilding of the Temple. This prayer is
a formal part of the thrice daily Jewish
prayer services.
A few, very small, Jewish groups support
constructing a Third Temple today, but
most Jews oppose this, for a variety of
reasons. Most religious Jews feel that
the Temple should only be rebuilt in the
messianic era, and that it would be
presumptuous of people to force God's
hand, as it were. And these people are
right! Conservative Judaism has modified
the prayers; their prayer books call for
the restoration of Temple, but do not
ask for resumption of animal sacrifices.
Most of the passages relating to
sacrifices are replaced with the
Talmudic teaching that deeds of
loving-kindness now atone for sin.
The religious Jewish religion was a
temporary dispensation, intended by its
divine author, God himself, to prefigure
one more complete and perfect, and
prepare men to embrace it. It not only
essentially required bloody sacrifices
(known as the korbanot), but
enjoined a fixed and certain place for
them to be performed in; this was the
temple at Jerusalem. Hence the final
destruction of this temple was the
abolition of the sacrifices, which
annihilated the whole system of this
religious institution. Jesus Himself
made the perfect sacrifice for us when
He died on that cross atop Calvary. Any
attempts by the Jews to sacrifice
animals again in the Temple can be and
was seen by God as a mockery of the
Messiah's death. God would not allow
this in 363 A.D., and He won't allow it
now.
St. Chrysostom shows that the
destruction of Jerusalem is to be
ascribed, not to the power of the
Romans, for God had often delivered it
from no less dangers; but to His special
providence. God was pleased to put these
now useless ceremonial observances out
of business. "As a physician," says
Chrysostom, "by breaking the cup,
prevents his patient from indulging his
appetite in a noxious draught; so God
withheld the Jews from their sacrifices
by destroying the whole city itself, and
making the place inaccessible to all of
them."
St. Gregory Nazianzen, Socrates,
Theodoret, and other Christian writers,
are unanimous in what they say of
Julian's motive, ascribing to him the
intention already mentioned, of
falsifying the scripture prophecies,
those of Daniel and Christ, which his
actions sufficiently evidence.
above a Julian solidus,
about 361 A.D.
Julian II
(The Apostate) (Flavius
Claudius Julianus)
as Augustus
Caesar 355-360 AD:
Augustus 360-363 AD
Julian
removed
Christianity
from
it's
position
as the
state
religion,
an act
that
earned
him the
title of
"Apostate".
Julian's ("The Apostate") historian,
indeed, says, that he undertook this
work out of a desire of rendering the
glory of his reign immortal by so great
an achievement: but this was only an
after-thought or secondary motive; and
Sozomen in particular assures us that
not only Julian, but that the idolaters
who assisted in it, pushed it forward
upon that very motive, and for the sake
thereof suspended their aversion to the
Jewish nation.
Julian himself wrote a letter to the
body or community of the Jews, extant
among his works, mentioned by Sozomen,
and translated by Dr. Cave, in his life
of St. Cyril. In it he declares them
free from all exactions and taxes, and
orders Julus or Illus, (probably Hillel,)
their most reverend patriarch, to
abolish the apostoli, or gatherers of
the said taxes; begs their prayers,
(such was his hypocrisy,) and promises,
after his Persian expedition, when their
temple should be rebuilt, to make
Jerusalem his residence, and to offer up
his joint prayers together with them.
After this Julus assembled the chief
among the Jews, and asked them why they
offered no bloody sacrifices, since they
were prescribed by their law. They
replied, that they could not offer any
but in the temple, which then lay in
ruins.. Whereupon he commanded them to
repair to Jerusalem, rebuild their
temple, and re-establish their ancient
worship, promising them his concurrence
towards carrying on the work.
The Jews received this warrant with
inexpressible joy, and were so elated
with it, that, flocking from all parts
to Jerusalem, they began insolently to
scorn and triumph over the Christians,
threatening to make them feel as fatal
effects of their severity, as they
themselves had heretofore from the Roman
powers.
The news was, no sooner spread abroad
than contributions came in from all
hands. The Jewish women stripped
themselves of their most costly
ornaments to contribute towards the
expense of the building. The emperor
also, who was no less impatient to see
it finished, in order to encourage them
in the undertaking, told them he had
found in their mysterious sacred books
that this was the time in which they
were to return to their country, and
that their temple and legal observances
were to be restored. He gave orders to
his treasurers to furnish money and
every thing necessary for the building,
which would require immense sums: he
drew together the most able workmen from
all quarters, and appointed for
overseers persons of the highest rank,
placing at their head his intimate
friend Alypius, who had formerly been
Pro-prefect of Britain; charging him to
make them labor in this great work
without ceasing, and to spare no
expense.
All things were In readiness, workmen
were assembled from all quarters; stone,
brick, timber, and other materials, in
immense quantities, were laid in. The
Jews of both sexes and of all degrees
bore a share in the labor; the very
women helping to dig the ground and
carry out the rubbish in their aprons
and skirts of their gowns. It its even
said that the Jews appointed some
pickaxes, spades, and baskets to be made
of silver for the honor of the work. But
the good bishop St. Cyril, lately
returned from exile, beheld all these
mighty preparations without any concern,
relying on the infallible truth of the
scripture prophecies: as,
that the desolation of the Jewish temple
should last till the end;
and that one stone should not be left on
another;
And being full of the spirit of God,
Cyril foretold, with the greatest
confidence, that the Jews, so far from
being able to rebuild their ruined
temple, would be the instruments whereby
that prophecy of Christ would be still
more fully accomplished than it had been
hitherto, and that they would not be
able to put one stone upon another, and
the event justified the prediction.
Till then the foundations and some ruins
of the walls of the temple subsisted, as
appears from St. Cyril: and Eusebius
says, the inhabitants still carried away
the stones for their private buildings.
These ruins the Jews first demolished
with their own hands, thus concurring to
the accomplishment of our Saviour's
prediction.
Then they began to dig the new
foundation, in which work many thousands
were employed. But what they had thrown
up in the day was, by repeated
earthquakes, the night following cast
back again into the trench. "And when
Alypius the next day earnestly pressed
on the work, with the assistance of the
governor of the province, there issued,"
says Ammianus, "'such horrible balls of
fire out of the earth near the
foundations,' which rendered the place,
from time to time, inaccessible to the
scorched and blasted workmen. And the
victorious element continuing in this
manner obstinately and resolutely bent
as it were to drive them to a distance,
Alypius thought proper to give over the
enterprise."
This is also recorded by the Christian
authors, who, besides the earthquake and
fiery eruption, mention storms,
tempests, and whirlwinds, lightning,
crosses impressed on the bodies and
garments of the assistants, and a
flaming cross in the heavens, surrounded
with a luminous circle. The order
whereof seems to have been as follows.
This judgment of the Almighty was
ushered in by storms and whirlwinds, by
which prodigious heaps of lime and sand
and other loose materials were carried
away. After these followed lightning,
the usual consequence of collision of
clouds in tempests. Its effects were,
first the destroying the more solid
materials, and melting down the iron
instruments; and secondly, the
impressing shining crosses on the bodies
and garments of the assistants without
distinction, in which there was
something that in art and elegance
exceeded all painting or embroidery;
which when the infidels perceived, they
endeavored, but in vain, to wash them
out. In the third place came the
earthquake which cast out the stones of
the old foundations, and shook the earth
into the trench or cavity dug for the
new; besides overthrowing the adjoining
buildings and porticoes wherein were
lodged great numbers of Jews designed
for the work, who were all either
crushed to death, or at least maimed or
wounded. The number of the killed or
hurt was increased by the fiery eruption
in the fourth place, attended both with
storms and tempests above, and with an
earthquake below. From this eruption,
many fled to a neighboring church for
shelter, but could not obtain entrance;
whether on account of its being closed
by a secret invisible hand, as the
fathers state the case, or at least by a
special providence, through the entrance
into the oratory being choked up by a
freighted crowd, all pressing to be
foremost.
"This, however," says St. Gregory
Nazianzen, "is invariably affirmed and
believed by all, that as they strove to
force their way in by violence, the
<Fire>, which burst from the foundations
of the temple, met and stopped them, and
one part it burnt and destroyed, and
another it desperately maimed, leaving
them a living monument of God's wrath
against sinners." This eruption was
frequently renewed till it overcame the
rashness of the most obdurate, to use
the words of Socrates; for it continued
to be repeated as often as the
projectors ventured to renew their
attempt, till it had fairly tired them
out.
Lastly, on the same evening, there
appeared over Jerusalem a lucid cross,
shining very bright, as large as that in
the reign of Constantine, encompassed
with a circle of light. "And what could
be so proper to close this tremendous
scene, or to celebrate this decisive
victory, as the <Cross> triumphant,
encircled with the <Heroic> symbol of
conquest?"
This miraculous event, with all its
circumstances, is related by the writers
of that age; by St. Gregory Nazianzen in
the year immediately following it; by
St. Chrysostom, in several parts of his
works, who says that it happened not
twenty years before, appeals to
eye-witnesses still living and young,
and to the present condition of those
foundations, "of which," says he, "we
are all witnesses;" by St. Ambrose in
his fortieth epistle written in 388;
Rufinus, who had long lived upon the
spot; Theodoret, who lived in the
neighborhood in Syria; Philostorgius,
the Arian; Sozomen, who says many were
alive when he wrote who had it from
eye-witnesses, and mentions the visible
marks still subsisting; Socrates, &c.
The testimony of the heathens
corroborates this evidence; as that of
Ammianus Marcellinus above quoted, a
nobleman of the first rank, who then
lived in the court of Julian at Antioch
and in an office of distinction, and who
probably wrote his account from the
letter of Alypius to his master at the
time when the miracle happened.
Libanius, another pagan friend and
admirer of Julian, both in the history
of his own life, and in his funeral
oration on Julian's death, mentions
these earthquakes in Palestine, but with
a shyness which discovers the disgrace
of his hero and superstition. Julian
himself speaks of this event in the same
covert manner.
The early church historian Socrates
testifies, that at the sight of the
miracles, the Jews at first cried out
that Christ is God; yet returned home as
hardened as ever. St. Gregory Nazianzen
says, that many Gentiles were converted
upon it, and went over to the Church.
Theodoret and Sozomen say many were
converted; but as to the Jews, they
evidently mean a sudden flash of
conviction, not a real and lasting
conversion. The incredulous blinded
themselves by various presences: but the
evidence of the miracle leaves no room
for the least cavil or suspicion.
The Christian writers of that age are
unanimous in relating it with its
complicated circumstances, yet with a
diversity which shows their agreement,
though perfect, could not have been
concerted. The same is confirmed by the
testimony of the most obstinate
adversaries. They who, when the temple
at Daphne was consumed about the same
time, by lightning, pretended that it
was set on fire by Christians, were not
able to suspect any possibility of
contrivance in this case: nor could the
event have been natural. Every such
suspicion is removed by the conformity
of the event with the prophecies: the
importance of the occasion, the extreme
eagerness of Jews and Gentiles in the
enterprise, the attention of the whole
empire fixed on it, and the
circumstances of the fact. The eruption,
contrary to its usual nature, was
confined to one small spot; it
obstinately broke out by fits, and
ceased with the project, and this in
such a manner, that Ammianus himself
ascribes it to an intelligent cause.
The phenomena of the cross in the air,
and on the garments, were admirably
fitted, as moral emblems, to proclaim
the triumph of Christ over Julian, who
had taken the cross out of the military
ensigns, which Constantine had put there
to be a lasting memorial of that cross
which he had seen in the air that
presaged his victories. The same was
again erected in the heavens to confound
the vanity of its impotent persecutor.
The earthquake was undoubtedly
miraculous; and though its effects were
mostly such as might naturally follow,
they were directed by a special
supernatural providence, as the burning
of Sodom by fire from heaven. Whence Mr.
Warburton concludes his dissertation on
this subject with the following
corollary. "New light continually
springing up from each circumstance as
it passes in review, by such time as the
whole event is considered, this
illustrious miracle comes out in one
full blaze of evidence."
Even Jewish Rabbis, who do not copy from
Christian writers, relate this event in
the same manner with the fathers from
their own traditions and records. This
great event happened in the beginning of
the year 363. St. Chrysostom admires
the wonderful conduct of divine
providence in this prodigy, and
observes, that had not the Jews set
about to rebuild their temple, they
might have pretended they could have
done it: therefore did God permit them
thrice to attempt it; once under Adrian,
when they brought a greater desolation
upon themselves; a second time under
Constantine the Great, who dispersed
them, cut off their ears, and branded
their bodies with the marks of
rebellion. He then relates this third
attempt, "in our own time," as he says,
"not above twenty years ago, in which
God himself visibly baffled their
endeavors, to show that no human power
could reverse his decree; and this at a
time when our religion was oppressed,
lay under the axes, and had not the
liberty even to speak; that impudence
itself might not have the least shadow
of presence."
SEE APOLOGETICS
FOR FACTS THAT DEFEND THE CHRISTIAN FAITH.